From: Darren Browning (DBrowning@Everlogic.com)
Date: Fri Jun 24 2005 - 17:01:38 GMT-3
Although id agree it's a bad practice to have address 172.16.26.49
255.255.50.0
But this will work, this gives you 52,736 addresses range's are
172.16.18.0 - 172.16.223.255
Cheers
Daz
CCIE#7976
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Godswill Oletu
Sent: 24 June 2005 20:40
To: Stewart, Dirk; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Subnet Question? Help
it might be error, they likely meant 172.16.26.49/255.255.0.0
255.255.50.0 is a bad subnet mask.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, Dirk" <Dirk.Stewart@co.fulton.ga.us>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 3:21 PM
Subject: Subnet Question? Help
> Is this a valid subnet and where and how would I use it. Does ISP use
> this kind of subnet.. If this is possible how much networks and host
> could I get from it...
>
> 172.16.26.49
>
> 255.255.50.0
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content for Fulton County by DefendMail, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3