Re: OSPF 0.0.0.0 wildcard (inverse) mask

From: Mark Atis (yesar1@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jun 24 2005 - 08:43:55 GMT-3

• Next message: robbie: "Re: bandwidth of e1"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "RE: Break key"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Roberts: "Re: OSPF 0.0.0.0 wildcard (inverse) mask"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Greetings,

Let me ask another question . some of you have stated
that they will always use 0.0.0.0 wild mask unless
requested otherwise . can you please elaborate on the
choice versus using a wild mask that matches the
actual subnet mask for the network being advertised to
OSPF .

Example :
if you are given an interface of 192.168.1.1/24 , why
would you choose to advertise it as
network 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 area BALH
rather than
network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area BLAH

Thanks

                
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html

• Next message: robbie: "Re: bandwidth of e1"
• Previous message: ccie2be: "RE: Break key"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Roberts: "Re: OSPF 0.0.0.0 wildcard (inverse) mask"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3