From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Jun 23 2005 - 22:39:11 GMT-3
Yes, you're acl is correct and I agree with you about the logic.
It's very confusing.
Some might even say it's counter-intuitive.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
Matus
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:00 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: igmp neighbor filter
i hate this logic but.........
if you wanted to deny host 1.2.3.4 from being a pim neighbor, would the acl
be:
ip pim neighbor-filter 1
access-list 1 deny 1.2.3.4
access-list 1 permit any ?
i always feel that if something is a "filter" you are inherantly denying it
so my "feeling" is that you should only have to say "permit 1.2.3.4", but i
think this is wrong.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3