From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Fri Jun 24 2005 - 01:20:03 GMT-3
darn tootin' !!!
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "'John Matus'" <john_matus@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: igmp neighbor filter
> Yes, you're acl is correct and I agree with you about the logic.
>
> It's very confusing.
>
> Some might even say it's counter-intuitive.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> John
> Matus
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:00 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: igmp neighbor filter
>
> i hate this logic but.........
> if you wanted to deny host 1.2.3.4 from being a pim neighbor, would the
> acl
> be:
>
> ip pim neighbor-filter 1
> access-list 1 deny 1.2.3.4
> access-list 1 permit any ?
>
>
> i always feel that if something is a "filter" you are inherantly denying
> it
> so my "feeling" is that you should only have to say "permit 1.2.3.4", but
> i
> think this is wrong.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3