From: Ed Lui (edwlui@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 23 2005 - 21:50:03 GMT-3
Gladston,
I would set the ip precedence on the interfaces where the traffic comes
into the port(s). Once the traffic is marked, it goes out with the same ip
precedence.
Ed
On 6/23/05, gladston@br.ibm.com <gladston@br.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the reply Ed,
>
> Did you see any way to set ip precedence when traffic goes OUT an
> interface on 3550?
>
> I can not see a way to do that, besides police (set is not allowed on
> Egress); and police is not good because we can mark down only excess
> traffic. And the system requires at the minimum 8000 for conformed, so some
> traffic would not be marked.
>
> PBR and CAR does not work to mark traffic on 3550.
>
> Any other idea?
>
>
> Cordially,
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gladston
>
>
>
> *Ed Lui <edwlui@gmail.com>*
>
> 23/06/2005 16:58 Please respond to
> Ed Lui <edwlui@gmail.com>
>
> To
> Alaerte Gladston Vidali/Brazil/IBM@IBMBR cc
> ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject
> Re: Traffic Precedence
>
>
>
>
>
> Gladston,
>
> I would set the precedence on both incoming and outgoing traffic.
>
> Ed Lui
>
>
> On 6/23/05, *gladston@br.ibm.com* <gladston@br.ibm.com> <*
> gladston@br.ibm.com* <gladston@br.ibm.com>> wrote:Hi,
>
> This prepositions...
>
> How would you interpret this?
> "traffic on Vlan 10 should have precedence flash"
>
> It is traffic going "to" vlan 10 or traffic "coming from" vlan 10.
> For example:
>
> vlan10------SW
>
> SW should configure precedence for traffic transmitted to vlan 10 or it
> should configure precedence for traffic received on vlan10?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> *http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
*<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3