Re: Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 21:39:39 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie2be: "RE: Interpreting Traceroute results - Follow-up"
• Previous message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)"
• Maybe in reply to: robbie: "Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If you are renting a lab that makes impossible to use Ethereal or other, you can try 'ip nbar capture x x x x'.

• Next message: ccie2be: "RE: Interpreting Traceroute results - Follow-up"
• Previous message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)"
• Maybe in reply to: robbie: "Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:42 GMT-3