Re: dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)

From: gladston@br.ibm.com
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 21:31:17 GMT-3

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded"
• Previous message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "CallBack and Dialer Load-threshold"
• Maybe in reply to: John Matus: "dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)"
• Next in thread: George Cassels: "RE: dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I just see one way on Deal's book.

Well, if the Brian's says there is another way, it must be right. I will try to test it.

Hope you get more feedback.

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: Re: icmp - time-exceeded vs ttl-exceeded"
• Previous message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "CallBack and Dialer Load-threshold"
• Maybe in reply to: John Matus: "dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)"
• Next in thread: George Cassels: "RE: dynamic acl question (IE vs. CISCO)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:42 GMT-3