From: 22Cent@gmail.com
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 15:38:33 GMT-3
That was the trick. You guys are awsome. Thanks!!!!
redistribute ospf 22 match external 1
On 6/20/05, George Cassels <glcassels3@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> I think you are right on with this one. I would also check the sh
> ip ospf and sh ip bgp to make sure the RIDs are the same, but I would
> also put the redistribute ospf 1 match internal external 1 external 2
> command.
>
> George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Hoonpongsimanont, Chalermchai
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:34 AM
> To: Lee Carter; 22Cent@gmail.com; Group Study
> Subject: RE: Indirect redistribution on 2 routers
>
> If I remembered correctly, OSPF will not redistribute external route
> into
> BGP by default. Could this be the reason why?
>
> David
> CCIE #14141
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Carter [mailto:l2carter@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:22 PM
> To: 22Cent@gmail.com; Group Study
> Subject: Re: Indirect redistribution on 2 routers
>
> When redistributing ospf into BGP I belive you have
> the same router-id to verify (hard code would be best)
> the router ID's on both BGP and OSPF for
> redistribution to work.
>
> I would say that if router 2 sees an OSPF route and
> you redistribute it into BGP then you should be good
> to go (assuming you have similar router-id's).
>
> Also, R3 (if syncronization is enabled and R2/R3 are
> running IBGP) then R3 would see the route in it's ibgp
> table ("show ip bgp") but would not install it "show
> ip route bgp" until you disable syncronization or
> somehow get it to R3 (ospf...)
>
> HTH.
>
> Lee
>
> --- "22Cent@gmail.com" <22cent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> > I've read posts on indirect redistribution on the
> > same router is not
> > possible. I wanted to post something similar that I
> > can not get to
> > work( perhaps its too late for me to be attempting
> > this ).
> > Anyways here goes.
> >
> > router 1 is runing ospf with router 2.
> > router 1 is redistributing its connected interface
> > in ospf
> > router 2 is able to see router 1's connected
> > interface throught
> > redistribution ( all is good)
> >
> > router 2 is a bgp neighbor with router 3
> > router 2 has redistribute ospf in its bgp
> > configuration.
> > router 3 is not able to see the redistributed
> > connected route from R1.
> >
> > Question. Does this fall into the same indirection
> > redistribution
> > issue? My thought is that since R1 is redistributing
> > its connected
> > interface to R2. why wouldn't R2 pass this info onto
> > R3 ?
> >
> > Any help would be great. TIA
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:42 GMT-3