RE: PBR Problems

From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 00:32:20 GMT-3


Interesting. I am trying to understand the difference between the set
interface and the set next hop command that was suggested. Don't these
accomplish the same thing?

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Chad Hintz
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:06 AM
To: Chris Aguillo; ccie lab
Subject: Re: PBR Problems

route-map FI-INTERNET permit 10
  match ip address 1
  set ip next-hop 292.168.242.17
 
HTH,
 
Chad

Chris Aguillo <ccaguillo1@hotpop.com> wrote:
Hi,

Basically, I have two active internet connections from my router.
I have a static route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 via S0 for the general internet. I

wanted my S1 for internet access for specific ip address coming from the

LAN and other internet user will be via my S0.

I used PBR to do this but when there is an intended traffic via S1, it
is sending in load balancing starting in S0 and then S1.

Or am I using the wrong method. My goal is to route all traffic received

from Gi0/0 to/from Se0/0/0 and Gi0/1 to/from Se0/1/0.

Is there any workaround for this?

Thanks for the help

my config below

interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description FROM_NET1
ip address 172.17.17.10 255.255.255.0
duplex full

interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description FROM_NET2
ip address 192.168.5.10 255.255.255.0
ip access-group 1 in
ip policy route-map FI-INTERNET

interface Serial0/0/0
description INTERNET_1
ip address 222.42.161.74 255.255.255.252

interface Serial0/1/0
description ITERNET_2
ip address 292.168.242.18 255.255.255.252

ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 222.42.161.73

access-list 1 permit 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 log

route-map FI-INTERNET permit 10
match ip address 1
set interface Serial0/1/0



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:40 GMT-3