From: Long Kwok (lkwok@ccieunix.com)
Date: Sun May 29 2005 - 17:50:05 GMT-3
Thanks Tim that is a great Idea , it does work , but it seems that ospf
adjacencies wont form over this connection now for some reason , I will
look at this some more , but yes ip unnumbered makes it now pingable but
seem ospf wont connect on that very strange wonder why ? I am using
loopback as ip unnumbered , and loopback is being propagated via ospf ,
but now since changing the ip address under the physical interface ospf
wont form adjacency even after resetting the process , maybe its because
I am using loopback for router-id's ??
TIA . Long
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 1:29 PM
To: Long Kwok; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Requirement of having to ping your own frame relay
interface
How about using ip unnumbered on the f/r interface? If the reference
interface is pingable, I think this should work.
HTH, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Long
Kwok
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 4:18 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Requirement of having to ping your own frame relay interface
If you are required to ping your own frame relay interface on all core
routers , but you are explicitly denied the ability of using any static
layer 3 to layer 2 methods how could you do this ? When using only a
physical frame relay interface so point to point subinterfaces are not
permitted ??
TIA Long
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:03 GMT-3