From: Andrew Lee Lissitz (alissitz@corvil.com)
Date: Wed May 25 2005 - 12:36:07 GMT-3
Hello GS, Mark
I hope all is well. To follow up Mark's question, what is the best URL for
the recommendations of the TX-ring size when doing QoS on ATM links?
Mark, if you are not performing QoS on the ATM interfaces then leaving the
TX-ring limit @ the default is the recommendation. If you are performing
QoS then the TX-ring limit should be adjusted in order for your QoS configs
to have affect...
I can not seem to find the URL I once saw with the recommended TX-ring
sizes.... anyone? TIA!
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Lasarko
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 11:28 AM
To: 'GroupStudy'
Subject: tx-?-limit
Looking for other ways to tweak interfaces:
Rack1R1(config-if)#tx?
tx-ring-limit
Rack1R1(config-if)#tx-ring-limit 123
Rack1R1(config-if)#end
Rack1R1#sh run | b interface Serial0/0
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
tx-ring-limit 123
tx-queue-limit 123
(note: tx-queue-limit is automagically added to the config)
I tried looking this up only to find some ATM-PA references that did not
clarify.
...Same commands (or lack thereof) appear to be true/available on ethernet,
etc...
I hope am clear in thinking this has nothing to do with the hold-queue in |
out command
(which defines the maximum # of input and output queues as I understand it)
That said, I am curious just what this does, if anything
And why we cannot do just a queue-limit?
(since that command does not exist??)
~M
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:02 GMT-3