Re: Re: Snmp and Link-status notification

From: SIMON HART (simon.hart@btinternet.com)
Date: Tue May 24 2005 - 10:57:27 GMT-3

Next message: ccie2be: "RE: rip default route vs summary 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0"
Previous message: Kunle: "Tunneling Decnet"
Maybe in reply to: Sean C: "Re: Snmp and Link-status notification"
Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: Re: Snmp and Link-status notification"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Gladston,

I can confirm, after testing on my routers, that in such a configuration the link-up-down notification is not sent

Simon

gladston@br.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Sean,

Not to mention that you can enable all traps globally and filter by server:

snmp-server enable traps
snmp-server host 142.20.28.150 traps COMMUNITY-STRING bgp
snmp-server host 142.20.28.150 traps COMMUNITY-STRING config

I am wondering if it filter link-up-down in this case.

Good point Simon, thanks.

Next message: ccie2be: "RE: rip default route vs summary 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0"
Previous message: Kunle: "Tunneling Decnet"
Maybe in reply to: Sean C: "Re: Snmp and Link-status notification"
Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: Re: Snmp and Link-status notification"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:12:01 GMT-3