From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu May 12 2005 - 13:03:56 GMT-3
Tim,
The solution does not involve 802.1q tunneling.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> ccie2be
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:28 AM
> To: Group Study
> Cc: Brian McGahan; Brian Dennis
> Subject: dot.1q tunneling - IE Vol II, lab 9, task 1.4
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to configure this. I think dot.1q is the
way
> to go but I can't test this with the equipment I have.
>
> rtr-1 ------------- Cat-1 --- Cat-2 ----------------- rtr-2
> .2 < vlan 2 > < vlan 20> .254
>
> | < 192.10.1.x/24 >|
>
>
> 802.1q trunks have been configured between the 2 3550's and both Cat's
> have
> their system mtu set as 1504.
> I've configured each cat port connecting the rtr's as follows:
>
> Cat-1
> interface FastEthernet0/2
> switchport access vlan 2
> switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
> no ip address
> no cdp enable <- added by default
> spanning-tree bpdufilter enable <- added by default
>
> Cat-2
> interface FastEthernet0/24
> switchport access vlan 20
> switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
> no ip address
> no cdp enable
> spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
>
> With the rtr's I'm using I can't configure 802.1q trunking on the
ethernet
> ports connected to the Cat's. And, when I put the ip addr on the phy
int,
> pings don't work from rtr-1 to rtr-2.
>
> Am I approaching this problem correctly? If I were able to configure
the
> ethernet ports with 802.1q trunks, would this work?
>
> TIA, Tim
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:57 GMT-3