From: Sean C (Upp_and_Upp@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun May 08 2005 - 13:54:27 GMT-3
Hi K C,
I can't validate if this is still true or not, but I remember a valuable
discussion on this topic from GroupStudy last year:
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200407/threads.html#00564
Also, you may want to consider matching on source and destination port 2067
as well as 2065.
HTH,
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "k c" <jwongccie@yahoo.com.hk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 10:52 AM
Subject: Match Protocol or Match ip address
> Hi Group,
>
> In order to classify dlsw packets, which one is preferred in the lab:
>
> class-map match-all dlsw
> match protocol dlsw
>
> or using access-list:
>
> class-map match-all DLSW
> match access-group 150
> access-list 150 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> access-list 150 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
>
> Also in priority list:
> priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065
> or
> priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> 7Q'Y.I&,(l7s email 3q*>!H
> $U8| Yahoo! Messenger
> http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:57 GMT-3