Match Protocol or Match ip address

From: k c (jwongccie@yahoo.com.hk)
Date: Sun May 08 2005 - 11:52:12 GMT-3

Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Marking DLSW with NBAR"
Previous message: my-ccie-test@libero.it: "Re: RE: Difference within the MQC framework of set dscp and set"
Next in thread: Sean C: "Re: Match Protocol or Match ip address"
Maybe reply: Sean C: "Re: Match Protocol or Match ip address"
Maybe reply: k c: "Re: Match Protocol or Match ip address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group,

In order to classify dlsw packets, which one is preferred in the lab:

class-map match-all dlsw
match protocol dlsw

or using access-list:

class-map match-all DLSW
match access-group 150
access-list 150 permit tcp any any eq 2065
access-list 150 permit tcp any eq 2065 any

Also in priority list:
priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 2065
or
priority-list 1 protocol dlsw high

Thanks.

---------------------------------
7Q'Y.I&,(l7s email 3q*>!H
$U8| Yahoo! Messenger
http://messenger.yahoo.com.hk

Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Marking DLSW with NBAR"
Previous message: my-ccie-test@libero.it: "Re: RE: Difference within the MQC framework of set dscp and set"
Next in thread: Sean C: "Re: Match Protocol or Match ip address"
Maybe reply: Sean C: "Re: Match Protocol or Match ip address"
Maybe reply: k c: "Re: Match Protocol or Match ip address"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:57 GMT-3