From: John Matus (john_matus@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu May 05 2005 - 15:19:24 GMT-3
if they are 2 different protocol stacks then i would think they would be 2
different protocol numbers.......
it's not an issue, i'm just an inquisitive fellow....
>From: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
>To: "John Matus" <john_matus@hotmail.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: ospf protocol number
>Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 00:26:24 -0400
>
>John,
>
> They are different protocol stacks, why would this be an issue?
>
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>Of
> > John Matus
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 6:03 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: ospf protocol number
> >
> > ospf AND ospfv3 are protocol # 89??? i thought each on would be
> > different.
> > i don't konw why...hmmm. maybe i'm overthinking it.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
>FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 03 2005 - 10:11:56 GMT-3