From: Hai Minh (minh@ipmac.com.vn)
Date: Thu Apr 28 2005 - 00:49:49 GMT-3
In my opinion,
Q1. FRTS is shaping tool and I don't think we need it when queueing.
Q2. No :-)
Q3. I will mark the packets on outgoing interface of R1, so I don't need
match the SA.
If I mark on R2's incoming interface, I need only one "match
source-address mac" in my class-map
Q4. Answer is pending :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: <sumit.kumar@comcast.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:01 AM
Subject: questions that keep coming back
> Some generic quick questions which I collected over time, feel free to
answer any one or all.
>
> Q1 Do we need to use FRTS if the question asks for Custom/Prioirty/CBWFQ
queueing on a Frame-relay interface?
>
> Q2 If yes should be define the CIR/Bc/Be and Min CIR values in the
map-class even if they are not provided in question?
>
> Q3 If queston asks to classify traffic from a router instead of address
should be we have multiple statements defining each interface address as
source. for example if R1 and R2 are connected via ethernet and question
asks mark all packets coming from R1 with DSCP 56 - do we need just one
statement with SA of R1's ethernet address or multiple statements for SA of
each interface on R1?
>
> Q4 Has anyone used Key-chains in ISIS ?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:10 GMT-3