From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 12:15:06 GMT-3
> 2) If I'm understanding your email correctly, yes, there is a command
to
> apply BECN shaping to FRTS - but it's not under class-map, it's under
a
> frame map-class:
> frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/
wa
> n_r/wan_f1g.htm#wp1045936
BECN adapt with MQC based FRTS is enabled with the "shape adaptive"
command under the policy-map class-map subconfiguration mode.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Sean C
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:59 AM
> To: Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: MQC based FRTS
>
> 1) The best way I can explain it is still by providing what is
available
> from Cisco:
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1834/products_feature_
gu
> ide09186a00800800fc.html#1019894
>
> In a real-world example, I use peak more when a customer has a frame
port
> that has a 'high port rate' but a small CIR. IOW - some customers we
> support have a 768 Frame port but only have a 4k CIR. We use Peak
rate
> values to make sure the customers can use the extra BW if available.
>
> 2) If I'm understanding your email correctly, yes, there is a command
to
> apply BECN shaping to FRTS - but it's not under class-map, it's under
a
> frame map-class:
> frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/
wa
> n_r/wan_f1g.htm#wp1045936
>
> 3)Not sure what you are asking.
>
> 4) It's applied at the physical interface level:
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/
wa
> n_r/wan_f2g.htm#wp1062131
> You are required to apply the physical command even if you are only
> wanting
> to shape 1 subinterface. Be wary though:
> The default committed information rate (CIR) of 56K will apply in the
> following situations:
>
> When traffic shaping is enabled (by using the frame-relay
traffic-shaping
> command), but a map- lass is not assigned to the VC
>
> When traffic shaping is enabled (by using the frame-relay
traffic-shaping
> command) and a map class is assigned to the VC, but traffic-shaping
> parameters have not been defined in the map-class
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123cgcr/
wa
> n_r/wan_f2g.htm#wp1062131
>
> HTH,
> Sean
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni" <PankajKu@hclcomnet.co.in>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 1:58 AM
> Subject: MQC based FRTS
>
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I guess this question would have appeared on the list earlier, so
kindly
> > bear with me. Even after referring to the UNIVERCD there is still
some
> > grey cells on which I seek your inputs.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) What is the difference between "shape average" and "shape
> > peak"?
> >
> > 2) Is there any command to enable BECN based FRTS?
> >
> > 3) "shape adaptive" is used to configure the "minCIR"
parameter.
> >
> > 4) "Frame-relay traffic-shaping" command isn't required at the
> > interface level.
> >
> >
> >
> > Apart from the above points any other inputs would be appreciated
too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pankaj K
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:08 GMT-3