OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST

From: PhiL (theccie@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 15:06:53 GMT-3

• Next message: Dennis J. Hartmann: "NMC#2"
• Previous message: Mark Lasarko: "Re: Switchport nonegotiate / DTP"
• Next in thread: Mark Lasarko: "Re: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "Re: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "Re: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Maybe reply: Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni: "RE: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

All,

I was reading about uplinkfast and backbonefast on CatOS. If I have
uplinkfast enabled on all my switches, would I ever need backbonefast
enabled also?

-- 
Regards,
PhiL

• Next message: Dennis J. Hartmann: "NMC#2"
• Previous message: Mark Lasarko: "Re: Switchport nonegotiate / DTP"
• Next in thread: Mark Lasarko: "Re: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Maybe reply: Mark Lasarko: "Re: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Maybe reply: Ram Shummoogum: "Re: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Maybe reply: Pankaj Madhukar Kulkarni: "RE: OT: UPLINKFAST versus BACKBONEFAST"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:04 GMT-3