From: Gajewski Mariusz (Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl)
Date: Wed Apr 20 2005 - 08:18:47 GMT-3
Mani, everything not explicitly forbidden is a fair game to me.
If your solution works and doesn't break any of the rules - is is ok.. You
can always ask proctor if in doubt ;)
I saw that cisco enables mcast on loopbacks for announcing and treat it as a
good practice.
Thanks
Mariusz
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of mani
poopal
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:24 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: multicast doubt of frame-relay hub and spoke
Guys please look at the scenario below any help is appreciated.
Frame relay hub and spoke: RB hub and RA/RC spokes
e0(RA)s0--------------------s0(RB)HUB-----------s0(RC)e0 spoke
s0 =133.13.13.1 s0 133.13.13.2 s0=133.13.13.3
e0 =133.13.10.1 e0 133.13.20.1 e0=133.13.30.1
lo0 =133.13.1.1 lo0 133.13.2.2 lo0=133.13.3.3
scenario:
make RB mapping agent
make RA e0 Join mcast group 225.25.25.25
make RA announce it as RP.for multicast group 225.25.25.25
questions:
-If not asked to enable mcast on lo 0, is it ok to put lo 0 in pim and
announce RA lo 0(ip pim send-rp-announce lo 0) or should we announce e0
-once this is configured, unable to ping the mcast 225.25.25.25 group from
FR other spoke router(RC), so how we solve, even if a question doesnt asks
for static mcast routes and introduction of tunnel interfaces, can we use
it, how
thanks
Mani
B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
(416)431 9929
MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:55:03 GMT-3