Re: CAR- rate-limiit command

From: mani poopal (mani_ccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Apr 11 2005 - 13:32:14 GMT-3


Hi Bob,
 
My question is when you have multiple rate-limit statement what is the difference between;
 
exceed-action set-prec-continue 3
 
and
 
exceed-action set-prec-transmit 3<--If you put transmit option will other statments in the rate limit commands are checked too or you should always have exceed-action set-prec-continue 3
 command.
 
thanks
 
Mani

 
 

Bob Sinclair <bsin@cox.net> wrote:
Hi Tim,

CAR is the only place I know of, off hand, were Bc = Be means a zero Bc.
Please let me know if you see something different.

Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
www.netmasterclass.net

----- Original Message -----
From: ccie2be
To: 'Bob Sinclair' ; 'mani poopal' ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: CAR- rate-limiit command

Hi Bob,

Is CAR the only feature where " a Bc = Be is a zero Excess burst"?

I think I've been tripped up before by this.

TIA, Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Sinclair
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 7:24 PM
To: mani poopal; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CAR- rate-limiit command

Hi Mani,

The following is what my router likes, note the "exceed-action" before the
continue statement:

rate-limit output access-group 101 3000000 150000 150000 conform-action
set-prec-transmit 5 exceed-action set-prec-continue 3

Note that with CAR, a Bc = Be is a zero Excess burst. That is, if you
really
want a 150 K burst, you would want Bc 150000 Be 300000. This is NOT the
case
with MQC police command, where Be is absolute value of configured Be, not
difference. Suggestion: use MQC!

HTH,

Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
www.netmasterclass.net

----- Original Message -----
From: mani poopal
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 7:45 AM
Subject: CAR- rate-limiit command

Hi Guys,

Think a Scenario, where all tcp telent traffic has 3Mb and 150/150 kbps
normal/extended. Conform traffc should have precedence of 5 and non
conforming traffic precedence3.
All other traffic 2Mb and 125/125kbps normal/extended burst, conforming
traffic with ip prec 2 and non conforming traffic with ip prec of 0. I
have
some doubts in the configuration. Please look at the config and any help is
appreciated.

=====================================================
access-list 111 permit tcp any any eq 23
if)#rate-limit output access-group 101 3000000 150000 150000
conform-action
set-prec-transmit 5 exceed-action set-prec-transmit 3 <---LOOK AT THIS
LINE(line #ABC)
-if)#rate-limit output 2000000 125000 125000 conform-action
set-prec-transmit 2 exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0
======================================================
Guys in the CAR configuration above, look for syntax errors, I was
wondering
whether my line#ABC is right or should it be like below:
rate-limit output access-group 101 3000000 150000 150000 conform-action
set-prec-transmit 5 set-prec-continue 3 <---Line DEF Please look at the
difference between line#ABC AND DEF.

Any good suggestion are appreciated.

thanks

Mani

B.ENG,A+,CCNA,CCNP,CCNP-VOICE, CSS1,CNA,MCSE
(416)431 9929
MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:56 GMT-3