From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Apr 05 2005 - 18:05:32 GMT-3
Mani,
Are you sure that the 255 is the administrative distance?
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fiprrp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1022565
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
mani poopal
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 1:57 PM
To: John Matus; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: blocking eigrp routes
Hi John,
The number 255 you are talking is admin distance and not metric, so
changing to 255 make no meaning. To deny eigrp routes to a neighbor use
(A.) -routere)#distribute-list 100 out e 0 and access-list 100 deny ip
any any
or
(B.)-router)#eigrp stub receive only
PS:To not to advertise a eigrp out of specific interface(say e0 and s1)
(A.)use passive interface e0 and s0
or
(B.)Advertise eigrp on other interfaces with a interface ip and wild
card mask of 0.0.0.0
eg;network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0<--Make to advertise eigrp out only this
interfaces
HTH
Mani
John Matus <john_matus@hotmail.com> wrote:
if i wanted to block all eigrp routes from exiting to the next hop would
it
be:
offset-list 1 out 255 s0/0
access-l 1 permit 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 ?
i wasn't sure since rip's metric would be '16' for offset but i'm not
sure
about eigrp.
thanks in advance
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 03 2005 - 07:54:53 GMT-3