From: Joe Smith (j333smith@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 21 2005 - 11:50:13 GMT-3
Take off network 0.0.0.0 under router rip and see if that answers your
question.
>From: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
>Reply-To: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
>To: "Joe Smith" <j333smith@hotmail.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: RE: network 0.0.0.0 in RIP
>Date: 21 Mar 2005 03:23:49 -0000
>
> Hi,
>
> It works in RIP but in a different way and that is what I want to
>know,it is somewhat similar to passive interface.
>"network 0.0.0.0" will
>enable the router to receive RIP updates through all its interfaces.But it
>cannot advertise anything.Thanks.
>
>Manu
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 Joe Smith
>wrote :
> >The network 0.0.0.0 does not work in RIP like it does in OSPF or
>EIGRP as shown from your debug. RIP uses classful network statements.
> >
> >>
>From: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
> >>Reply-To: "MANU mohan"
><cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
> >>To: "Joe Smith" <j333smith@hotmail.com>,
>ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>Subject: RE: network 0.0.0.0 in RIP
> >>Date: 20 Mar
>2005 12:42:59 -0000
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have done the debug also which shows
>R2 doesn't advertise anything,but still receives routes from R1.Here is the
>output.In this case R1 is connected to R2 via Fastethernet ports.
> >>-----------------------------------------------
> >>Debug from R1
> >>
> >>
> >>R1#debug ip rip
> >>RIP protocol debugging is on
> >>R1#
> >>00:14:14: RIP:
>sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via FastEthernet0/1 (12.0.0
> >>1)
> >>00:14:14: RIP: build update entries
> >>00:14:14: network 1.0.0.0 metric
>1
> >>00:14:14: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Loopback0
>(1.0.0.1)
> >>00:14:14: RIP: build update entries
> >>00:14:14: network
>12.0.0.0 metric 1
> >>00:14:41: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via
>FastEthernet0/1 (12.0.0
> >>1)
> >>00:14:41: RIP: build update entries
> >>00:14:41:
>network 1.0.0.0 metric 1
> >>00:14:41: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255
>via Loopback0 (1.0.0.1)
> >>00:14:41: RIP: build update entries
> >>00:14:41:
>network 12.0.0.0 metric 1
> >>00:15:10: RIP: sending v1 update to
>255.255.255.255 via FastEthernet0/1 (12.0.0
> >>1)
> >>---------------------------------------
> >>
> >>Debug from R2
> >>
> >>
> >>R2#debug
>ip rip
> >>RIP protocol debugging is on
> >>R2#
> >>00:13:58: RIP: received v1
>update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:13:58: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:14:24: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:14:24: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:14:51: RIP: received v1 update from
>12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:14:51: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:15:20:
>RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:15:20:
>1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:15:47: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on
>FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:15:47: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:16:13: RIP: received
>v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:16:13: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:16:43: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:16:43: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:17:11: RIP: received v1 update from
>12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:17:11: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:17:40:
>RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:17:40:
>1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:18:08: RIP: received v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on
>FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:18:08: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>00:18:38: RIP: received
>v1 update from 12.0.0.1 on FastEthernet0/1
> >>00:18:38: 1.0.0.0 in 1 hops
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>Manu
> >>
> >>
> >>On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 Joe Smith wrote :
> >> >I would
>do a debug ip rip
> >> >
> >> >> From: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
> >>
> >>Reply-To: "MANU mohan" <cciemanu@rediffmail.com>
> >> >>To:
>ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> >>Subject: network 0.0.0.0 in RIP
> >> >>Date: 19 Mar
>2005 15:49:53 -0000
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Hi all,
> >> >> I have already noted down
>this problem,but didn't get a
> >> >>reply.Anyone have any idea with this.
> >> >>
>I have a doubt regarding the network
> >> >>statement used in RIP.I configured
>RIP between two routers.Suppose this is the
> >> >>topoogy:
> >> >>
> >> >>1.0.0.0
>(lo 0)----R1--s0----12.0.0.0/8---s0--R2-------2.0.0.0(lo 0)
> >> >>Here is the
>configuration
> >> >>
> >> >>R1
> >> >>router rip
> >> >>network 1.0.0.0
> >> >>network
>12.0.0.0
> >> >>
> >> >>R2
> >> >>router rip
> >> >>network 0.0.0.0
> >> >>
> >> >> In
>this case R2 is receiving routes from R1 but
> >> >>R2 will not advertise any
>routes although RIP has been enabled on serial
> >> >>interface.
> >> >>So is this
>similar to "enabling RIP on all interfaces and giving
> >> >>passive-interface
>default" ?
> >> >>
> >> >>Thanks in advance,
> >> >>
> >> >>Manu
> >> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >>Subscription information may be found at:
> >>
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> >
> >>
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >> >FREE
>pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
>http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> >> >
> >>
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >>
> >Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Express
>yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
>http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:49 GMT-3