From: marvin greenlee (marvin@ccbootcamp.com)
Date: Wed Mar 16 2005 - 15:47:40 GMT-3
You can also mix and match with nested class maps. In this case, a group of
protocols is matched with a match any for the class 'work-related'. The
class 'work' matches the class 'work-related', and a class 'days' which
specifies a time-range.
***********
time-range TEST
periodic weekdays 8:00 to 16:59
access-list 101 permit ip any any time-range TEST
class-map match-all days
match access-group 101
class-map match-any work-related
match protocol citrix
match protocol sqlserver
match protocol exchange
match protocol ipsec
class-map match-all work
match class-map days
match class-map work-related
policy-map office
class work
bandwidth 5000
***********
Marvin Greenlee, CCIE#12237, CCSI# 30483
Network Learning Inc
marvin@ccbootcamp.com
www.ccbootcamp.com (Cisco Training)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Georg Pauwen
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:37 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Class map match all match any [bcc][faked-from]
Importance: Low
Hello group,
this might be a stupid question, but I am just trying to clear some things
up: it was my understanding that the difference between a match-all and a
match-any in a class-map was that match-all has to match every single
condition, like the logical AND, and that match-any has to match either one
of the conditions, like the logical OR.
So in this example:
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www
access-list 102 permit tcp any any eq bgp
a class-map match-all:
class-map match-all WWW_AND_BGP
match ip address 101
match ip address 102
would never work, because the traffic types www and bgp will never be the
same.
A class-map match-any:
class-map match-any WWW_OR_BGP
match ip address 101
match ip address 102
would work, since either one of the access lists have to apply, and not
both.
Is this the right reasoning ? I am just asking because I have seen a sample
configs where the match-all statement was used like in the example above...
Thanks for your input in advance.
Regards,
Georg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:46 GMT-3