From: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com
Date: Mon Mar 14 2005 - 13:01:28 GMT-3
Yes
Regardiong bgp, this is what I believe on top of my head.
Regardless of auto-summary or no auto-summary
In case of bgp, if you use "network command with mask", it will announce it
classlessly.
But if you use only "network without mask", it will announce classfully.
With auto-summary, all learned bgp routes will be summarized classfully.
But you always want to turn off auto-summary on bgp as I haven't seen any
requirement.
Only rip( Maybe eigrp) is the one you have to pay attention.
Also, rip version 1( not supporting VLSM) will ignore any subnet mask.
It summarizes classfully any learned rip routes whose classful address is
not a part of any existing interface.
Or if it is a part of interface, then it will apply mask of interface to
that route.
Regards
Jongsoo
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, 14 March, 2005 10:27 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: auto-summary
Hi guys,
I just want to confirm something:
The commands, auto-summary and no auto-summary, work the same exact way in
rip, eigrp and bgp.
Is this completely true?
My lab is in 2 days and I'm a bit nervous so I'm trying to double check lots
of little details.
TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:45 GMT-3