From: Dillon Yang (gzdillon@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 06 2005 - 21:40:10 GMT-3
Hi, Bajo:
The difference I mean is the former mentions "contradiction" between "neighbor(eigrp)" and "passive-interface" and the later does not. So if someone used to refer to the later, then he must loss the key trick in the case posted by Scott. So do the other commands.
That is what I worried about.
Thanks.
dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bajo" <bajoalex@gmail.com>
To: "Dillon Yang" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>
Cc: "Chuck Ryan" <chryan@cisco.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
> Dillon,
>
> I could not see the contradiction in the two docs. The second link is
> saying one can suppress a subnet by just using "passive" on the
> interface". Yes, the statement assumes "e1" is also the 131.108.0.0 subnet.
>
> router eigrp 109
> network 131.108.0.0
> passive-interface ethernet 1
> neighbor 131.108.20.4
>
>
> Generally in documentation, printed version is not as reliable as
> online (or soft ) copy.
>
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 23:40:43 +0800, Dillon Yang <gzdillon@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > So, you see:
> > DOCCD
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1031837
> > and
> > COMMAND REFERENCE
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008010a39a.html#wp1042007
> > are mutually different. The pdf that I downloaded the last year is different from the current doccd(htm).
> > Which should we trust in?
> > dillon
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chuck Ryan" <chryan@cisco.com>
> > To: "Dillon Yang" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>
> > Cc: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 10:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
> >
> > > Hi Dillon,
> > >
> > > Take a look at the EIGRP commands on the doc cd at this link:
> > >
> > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1031837
> > >
> > > this specifically states the use of the neighbor statement under EIGRP and
> > > the effects of using passive-interface with EIGRP. I believe this is the
> > > difference that Scott may have been talking about (the difference in using
> > > passive-interface with EIGRP, compared to the other routing protocols).
> > >
> > > If I'm incorrect, then Scott can clarify further. :-)
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > > At 09:35 AM 3/6/2005, Dillon Yang wrote:
> > > >Hi, Scott:
> > > >
> > > >I can not find "passive-interface(rip)" at
> > > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008010a399.html#wp1019734,
> > > >what difference stated on DocCD?
> > > >best regards
> > > >dillon
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > > >To: "'Chuck Ryan'" <chryan@cisco.com>; "'Tom Young'" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
> > > >Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 12:03 AM
> > > >Subject: RE: eigrp neighbor command
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > You have to be careful NOT to use passive-interface here. It functions
> > > > > differently with EIGRP. Notes to this effect are also present in the
> > > > > command reference on DocCD.
> > > > >
> > > > > Scott
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > > > Chuck Ryan
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 10:21 AM
> > > > > To: Tom Young
> > > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > Your correct in that hello packets to 224.0.0.10 will not be used. To see
> > > > > what really happens when you use the neighbor command and passive-interface
> > > > > under EIGRP, lab this up between 2 routers and observe the results.
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that you'll find the results you get when using this with EIGRP,
> > > > > are nowhere near the same as when used with RIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, take a look at the EIGRP FAQ here on CCO with regards to the use of
> > > > > the neighbor command under EIGRP, and what benefits it does not bring you:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186
> > > > > a008012dac4.shtml#ten
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Chuck
> > > > >
> > > > > At 09:56 AM 3/5/2005, Tom Young wrote:
> > > > > >hi group
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The eigrp use multicast ip 224.0.0.10 for sharing the routing,but if
> > > > > >I use the neighbor command in eigrp, it will transfer ip information by
> > > > > >unicast to neighbor ,multicast ip 224.0.0.10 will not be used,right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >__________________________________
> > > > > >Let's Celebrate Together!
> > > > > >Yahoo! JAPAN
> > > > > >http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bajo
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:42 GMT-3