From: Dillon Yang (gzdillon@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 07 2005 - 12:19:49 GMT-3
Hi, Chuck:
After some labs, I found the "neighbor" and "passive-interface" can coexist under RIP, NOT under EIGRP. right?
Someone draw a conclusion at 911networks.com, how about this?
RIP hub & spoke, Hub should not advertise networks from the interface back out the same interface
On the hub: Do NOT disable split-horizon
On the spokes: Under the RIP process, make the interfaces passive
On the spokes: Use the neighbor statement to the other routers
Will change the TTL from 1 to 2 & will go passed the hub
TIA
dillon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Ryan" <chryan@cisco.com>
To: "Dillon Yang" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>
Cc: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
Hi Dillon,
Here's the information from the EIGRP FAQ on CCO:
Q. What does the neighbor statement in the EIGRP configuration section do?
A. Although the neighbor command is accepted by the Cisco IOS. parser, it
should not be used. The neighbor statement does not behave as intended and
can have a negative effect on EIGRP neighbors.
thanks,
Chuck
At 09:25 PM 3/5/2005, Dillon Yang wrote:
>Hi, chuck,
>
>Your link needs CCO password, I can not open it. Please extract the quote
>you wanted to tell us.
>
>Thanks.
>dillon
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Chuck Ryan" <chryan@cisco.com>
>To: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:20 PM
>Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
>
>
> > Hello Tom,
> >
> > Your correct in that hello packets to 224.0.0.10 will not be used. To see
> > what really happens when you use the neighbor command and
> passive-interface
> > under EIGRP, lab this up between 2 routers and observe the results.
> >
> > I believe that you'll find the results you get when using this with EIGRP,
> > are nowhere near the same as when used with RIP.
> >
> > Also, take a look at the EIGRP FAQ here on CCO with regards to the use of
> > the neighbor command under EIGRP, and what benefits it does not bring you:
> >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a008012dac4.shtml#ten
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > At 09:56 AM 3/5/2005, Tom Young wrote:
> > >hi group
> > >
> > > The eigrp use multicast ip 224.0.0.10 for sharing the
> > >routing,but if I use the neighbor command in eigrp, it
> > >will transfer ip information by unicast to neighbor
> > >,multicast ip 224.0.0.10 will not be used,right?
> > >
> > >
> > >__________________________________
> > >Let's Celebrate Together!
> > >Yahoo! JAPAN
> > >http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:42 GMT-3