From: Bajo (bajoalex@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 06 2005 - 14:17:52 GMT-3
Dillon,
I could not see the contradiction in the two docs. The second link is
saying one can suppress a subnet by just using "passive" on the
interface". Yes, the statement assumes "e1" is also the 131.108.0.0 subnet.
router eigrp 109
network 131.108.0.0
passive-interface ethernet 1
neighbor 131.108.20.4
Generally in documentation, printed version is not as reliable as
online (or soft ) copy.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 23:40:43 +0800, Dillon Yang <gzdillon@hotmail.com> wrote:
> So, you see:
> DOCCD
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1031837
> and
> COMMAND REFERENCE
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008010a39a.html#wp1042007
> are mutually different. The pdf that I downloaded the last year is different from the current doccd(htm).
> Which should we trust in?
> dillon
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Ryan" <chryan@cisco.com>
> To: "Dillon Yang" <gzdillon@hotmail.com>
> Cc: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 10:57 PM
> Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
>
> > Hi Dillon,
> >
> > Take a look at the EIGRP commands on the doc cd at this link:
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fiprrp_r/1rfeigrp.htm#wp1031837
> >
> > this specifically states the use of the neighbor statement under EIGRP and
> > the effects of using passive-interface with EIGRP. I believe this is the
> > difference that Scott may have been talking about (the difference in using
> > passive-interface with EIGRP, compared to the other routing protocols).
> >
> > If I'm incorrect, then Scott can clarify further. :-)
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > At 09:35 AM 3/6/2005, Dillon Yang wrote:
> > >Hi, Scott:
> > >
> > >I can not find "passive-interface(rip)" at
> > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008010a399.html#wp1019734,
> > >what difference stated on DocCD?
> > >best regards
> > >dillon
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
> > >To: "'Chuck Ryan'" <chryan@cisco.com>; "'Tom Young'" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>
> > >Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 12:03 AM
> > >Subject: RE: eigrp neighbor command
> > >
> > >
> > > > You have to be careful NOT to use passive-interface here. It functions
> > > > differently with EIGRP. Notes to this effect are also present in the
> > > > command reference on DocCD.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > > Chuck Ryan
> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 10:21 AM
> > > > To: Tom Young
> > > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Re: eigrp neighbor command
> > > >
> > > > Hello Tom,
> > > >
> > > > Your correct in that hello packets to 224.0.0.10 will not be used. To see
> > > > what really happens when you use the neighbor command and passive-interface
> > > > under EIGRP, lab this up between 2 routers and observe the results.
> > > >
> > > > I believe that you'll find the results you get when using this with EIGRP,
> > > > are nowhere near the same as when used with RIP.
> > > >
> > > > Also, take a look at the EIGRP FAQ here on CCO with regards to the use of
> > > > the neighbor command under EIGRP, and what benefits it does not bring you:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186
> > > > a008012dac4.shtml#ten
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > >
> > > > At 09:56 AM 3/5/2005, Tom Young wrote:
> > > > >hi group
> > > > >
> > > > > The eigrp use multicast ip 224.0.0.10 for sharing the routing,but if
> > > > >I use the neighbor command in eigrp, it will transfer ip information by
> > > > >unicast to neighbor ,multicast ip 224.0.0.10 will not be used,right?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >__________________________________
> > > > >Let's Celebrate Together!
> > > > >Yahoo! JAPAN
> > > > >http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
> > > > >
> > > > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Kind Regards,Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:42 GMT-3