From: Chuck Ryan (chryan@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Mar 05 2005 - 12:20:50 GMT-3
Hello Tom,
Your correct in that hello packets to 224.0.0.10 will not be used. To see
what really happens when you use the neighbor command and passive-interface
under EIGRP, lab this up between 2 routers and observe the results.
I believe that you'll find the results you get when using this with EIGRP,
are nowhere near the same as when used with RIP.
Also, take a look at the EIGRP FAQ here on CCO with regards to the use of
the neighbor command under EIGRP, and what benefits it does not bring you:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a008012dac4.shtml#ten
Regards,
Chuck
At 09:56 AM 3/5/2005, Tom Young wrote:
>hi group
>
> The eigrp use multicast ip 224.0.0.10 for sharing the
>routing,but if I use the neighbor command in eigrp, it
>will transfer ip information by unicast to neighbor
>,multicast ip 224.0.0.10 will not be used,right?
>
>
>__________________________________
>Let's Celebrate Together!
>Yahoo! JAPAN
>http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/so2005/
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:41 GMT-3