dlsw icanreach

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Mar 04 2005 - 18:45:50 GMT-3

• Next message: marvin greenlee: "RE: basic BRI with no mlppp question [bcc][faked-from]"
• Previous message: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: swm@emanon.com: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "FW: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,

Does this config make sense?

I want to advertise that this peer can only reach netbios hosts.

dlsw icanreach sap F0

dlsw icanreach netbios-exclusive

I'm not sure if the netbios-exclusive command can be used in this way or if
this command is only good when one host is specified.

Can someone let me know?

TIA, Tim

• Next message: marvin greenlee: "RE: basic BRI with no mlppp question [bcc][faked-from]"
• Previous message: Jongsoo.Kim@Intelsat.com: "RE: ip split-horizon on frame-relay; link state protocols"
• Next in thread: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: swm@emanon.com: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: ccie2be: "FW: dlsw icanreach"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: dlsw icanreach"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:40 GMT-3