From: nenad pudar (nenad.pudar@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 19 2005 - 00:38:38 GMT-3
And then if it is possible to configure summary-routes /24 separatelly
for each /24 (never tried) and apply higher distance in order to
owerride automatically added null route (distance 5) that is the
answer to original question.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:06:41 -0000, simon hart
<simon.hart@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Sundar's answer is right
>
> The question you put states that R2 and R3 should see an admin distance of
> 90.
>
> Some of the replies have suggested that you change the admin distance on R1,
> however admin distance is only locally significant. If you change the
> distance to 90 of the 172.168.1.0 routes on R1, R2 and R3 will still see
> them as EIGRP external routes and add their own admin distance of 170. Thus
> distance will not help in this situation.
>
> In fact one does need to add the 90 on the end of the summary statement.
> The summary addresses will be seen as internal to the eigrp 100 process and
> thus R2 and R3 will automatically apply an admin distance of 90.
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Sundar Palaniappan
> Sent: 18 February 2005 16:34
> To: joshua lauer
> Cc: Lee Donald; Nathasha Aleyevka; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: EIGRP Challenge!
>
> Config you need on R1 is:
>
> int f0/0
> ip summary-address eigrp 100 172.168.0.0 255.255.252.0 90
> ip summary-address eigrp 100 172.168.4.0 255.255.254.0 90
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --Sundar Palaniappan
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:16:12 -0500, joshua lauer <jslauer@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I was thinking the same way. Nathasha, this is interesting what scenario
> > book are you using or is this one you made up? Just curious, I'm going to
> > try it out. Right off hand cant think of anything other than modifying the
> > distance on R1.
> >
> > josh
> >
> > Joshua Lauer
> >
> > RHCE, MCSE, CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, CCIP, CCSP,INFOSEC, CEH
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lee Donald" <Lee.Donald@t-systems.co.uk>
> > To: "Nathasha Aleyevka" <naleyevka@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:42 AM
> > Subject: RE: EIGRP Challenge!
> >
> > > Try the distance command on R1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nathasha Aleyevka [mailto:naleyevka@yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: 18 February 2005 15:21
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: EIGRP Challenge!
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I have been working on the following scenario:
> > >
> > > | \ / |-----------------F0/0-R2
> > > | EIGRP \ / |
> > > | 101 \ / EIGRP 100 |
> > > |--------------------R1-f0/0-------------- | 10.123.10.0/24
> > > | --> / \ |
> > > | / \
> |-------------------F0/0-R3
> > > BB1 / \
> > >
> > > R1 is running 2 EIGRP processes, EIGRP 101 to BB1 and EIGRP 100 to R2
> and
> > > R3
> > > From BB1 Im receiveing the following routes:
> > > 172.168.1.0/24
> > > 172.168.2.0/24
> > > 172.168.3.0/24
> > > 172.168.4.0/24
> > > 172.168.5.0/24
> > > On R1, I redistributed between the 2 processes, therefore R2 and R3 have
> > > all
> > > the 172.168.x.x/24 routes in the routing table with an admin distance of
> > > 170. So far so good.
> > > To meet the requirements, R2 and R3 should see these routes with and
> admin
> > > distance of 90, the config must be done on R1 and I am not allowed:
> > > NOT ALLOWED to modify the administrative distance on R1
> > > NOT allowed to use route maps
> > > NOT allowed to use distribution lists/
> > >
> > > I was able to get it to work with route maps and modified the admin
> > > distance, unfortunately that doesnt meet the requirements. Any
> > > suggestions(!)
> > > It is much appreciated
> > > Thank you
> > > Nathasha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Meet the all-new My Yahoo! Try it today!
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/2005
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/2005
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:23 GMT-3