From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:08:51 GMT-3
Personally, I think it's better than any of the other vendors in terms of
the quantity and quality of stuff out there!
Occasionally, there are mishaps. And we may run into what SEEMS like a lot
of them because we like to push the envelope! But in the grand scheme of
things with the beau-coup (sp?) of stuff on there, the error count is small.
Certainly less errors per line than Microsoft generates!
;)
Mistakes do happen. I'm sure that if you search through the GS archives,
you'll find that all of us have made them on occasion!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:50 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: Quality of C I S C O documentation
Hi guys,
I'm just wondering how many people think like I do that Cisco Documentation
is extremely poor
especially what's included on the Doc-CD?
Aside from complaining about how terrible it is, do you think there's
anything that can be done that would make Cisco vastly improve the quality
of it's
documentation?
Personally, I think Cisco should demand the same level of quality from it's
documentation as it does for potential ccie's.
Can you imagine how good the documentation would be if the quality of the
documentation had to be as high as the skills
needed to pass the ccie lab?
What's your opinion?
Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:19 GMT-3