Quality of C I S C O documentation

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 13:50:24 GMT-3

• Next message: Jim Devane: "RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation"
• Previous message: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Quality of C I S C O documentation"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Quality of C I S C O documentation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi guys,

I'm just wondering how many people think like I do that Cisco Documentation is
extremely poor

especially what's included on the Doc-CD?

Aside from complaining about how terrible it is, do you think there's anything
that can be done that would make Cisco vastly improve the quality of it's

documentation?

Personally, I think Cisco should demand the same level of quality from it's
documentation as it does for potential ccie's.

Can you imagine how good the documentation would be if the quality of the
documentation had to be as high as the skills

needed to pass the ccie lab?

What's your opinion?

Tim

• Next message: Jim Devane: "RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation"
• Previous message: Richard Dumoulin: "RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Quality of C I S C O documentation"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Quality of C I S C O documentation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:19 GMT-3