From: Gajewski Mariusz (Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl)
Date: Wed Feb 02 2005 - 11:45:02 GMT-3
Thanks Duane and Tim , I got it now :)
Mariusz
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:15 PM
To: Gajewski Mariusz; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: wccp
Hi,
I had a detailed discussion about this with Scott Morris a while back - I
don't remember exactly how long ago - but here's the main point.
wccp was originally a way to redirect http requests to a cache so that these
requests wouldn't have to go out over the internet to get a response which
takes much longer.
Then wccp version 2 came out and allowed more than just http requests to be
redirected, for example, how about being able to redirect ftp.
By having a service #, wccp can redirect more than just http.
I don't remember all the details but check out the GS archives.
HTH, Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gajewski Mariusz" <Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:03 AM
Subject: wccp
> Hi everyone,
> when the task says to redirect http requests coming into
> interface Fe0/0 (with excluding one station) to web cache engine ,
> what is the difference between these two :
>
> access-list 10 deny 10.1.1.1
> access-list 10 permit any
>
> 1)
> R3(config)#ip wccp web-cache redirect-list 10 R3(config-if)#ip wccp
> web-cache redirect in
>
> 2)
> R3(config)# ip wccp 1 redirect-list 10
> R3(config-if)# ip wccp 1 redirect in
>
> Does the solution 2 will also work ? Im little confused about the
> second one , what does service # exactly mean in this case ? Is this
> just a
proces
> # ?
>
> Thanks in advance ,
>
> Mariusz
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:16 GMT-3