From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@netcogov.com)
Date: Wed Feb 02 2005 - 11:44:35 GMT-3
Probably a javascript app running locally is telling them. Or your real
address is embedded in the data portion of a packet, that the NAT
process can't change.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@netcogov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
cc ie
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 7:55 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: internal IP should be hidden ? Shouldn't it ?
My CE590 sits behind my PIX525 which sits behind my 7204VXR.
All port 80 traffic gets redirected into the CE590, 1918 addresses
gets PAT at the external interface of the cache engine. After which is
flows through the PIX before it leaves via 7204 out to the ISP.
Diagram:
INTERNET > 7204VXR > PIX525 > CE590> Switch>LAN> ME :-)
Can somebody please tell me how these guys at auditmypc can sniff my
internal address ?
http://www.auditmypc.com/freescan/scanoptions.asp
Dave
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:16 GMT-3