From: Gajewski Mariusz (Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 14:20:58 GMT-3
Suuure , no problemo :) work just fine.
Although there are some bugs I encountered , where e.g. there is no is-is on
the interface , but after you type them anyway , the features appears :) but
... The ospf disapears for example ... Magic :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Church, Chuck [mailto:cchurch@netcogov.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:58 PM
To: Gajewski Mariusz; Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
Apparently FN is wrong then. Although I've seen bugs where you can enter
commands, but they won't stay. Can you actually configure the OSPF, and see
it working?
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@netcogov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message-----
From: Gajewski Mariusz [mailto:Mariusz.Gajewski@telekomunikacja.pl]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Church, Chuck; Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
Wow! So it must be a miracle ;)
BB1(config-if)#ipv6 ospf ?
<1-65535> Process ID
cost Interface cost
database-filter Filter OSPF LSA during synchronization and
flooding
dead-interval Interval after which a neighbor is declared dead
demand-circuit OSPF demand circuit
flood-reduction OSPF Flood Reduction
hello-interval Time between HELLO packets
mtu-ignore Ignores the MTU in DBD packets
neighbor OSPF neighbor
network Network type
priority Router priority
retransmit-interval Time between retransmitting lost link state
advertisements
transmit-delay Link state transmit delay
Soft : c2500-is-l.122-15.T9.bin
With is-is I agree , there's nothing to look for on 25xx , but ipv6 ospf &
rip work just fine
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Church, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:28 PM
To: Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
Feature Navigator (www.cisco.com/go/fn) is the tool to use to solve these
questions. Basic IPv6 is supported on the 2500s, but if you try to add
OSPFv3, you'll see the 2500 support go away. It needs more memory.
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@netcogov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Amit
Jain
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:37 AM
To: Thorne, Gene
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
Gene
I used Cisco CCO login to find on Software Advisor that 2500 series IP Plus
images do support IPV6 and some services. Not sure how much is sufficient
for CCIE or whether they will have full command set or not. But definitely
they support and need 16/16 RAM and Flash
Amit
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 Gene
Thorne wrote :
>I searched the archives, but I could not find the previous
email from Bruce about v6 images for the 2500. If such images do exist,
which ones are they? I was under the impression that there were no v6 images
for the 2500, but maybe I missed the reference.
>-gt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Ralph
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM
>To: abcaslow@netmasterclass.net
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
>
>Thanks for the info. Andy!! Now I can get the dust off some of my old
2500s,
and put them to some good use.
>
>And actually, Andy, I'm one of those
numerous friends of yours that you have not actually met. Your book has been
very useful in my CCIE prep.
>
>Thanks again
>Ralph
>
>-----Original
Message-----
> From: "Andrew B. Caslow" <abcaslow@netmasterclass.net>
>To:
"'Ralph'" <Mandela@myrealbox.com>
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:27:48 -0500
>Subject: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
>Whoop, Sorry Ralph! I thought you
were a friend of mine. I apologize for
>responding to your e-mail as if your
name was "Raj".
>
>I think you will find the contents of my previous e-maul
useful. As I
>mentioned, there are images for the 2500 platform that run v6.
Good luck in
>your studies.
>
>I hope all is well.
>
>-Bruce Caslow CCIE #3139
> NetMasterClass, LLC
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From:
nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Ralph
>Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:54 AM
>To: netsteps@rediffmail.com
>Cc:
ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
>You
definitely a few 2600's. I do not think the 2500's can run the IPv6
>code, and
some of the new features in 12.2T.
>
>R.
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From:
netsteps@rediffmail.com
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005
01:10:27 -0500
>Subject: 2500 or 2600 for home lab?
>
>Hey all
>
>I am about
to purchase my home lab for scheduled CCIE Lab. Please advise me
>the
drawbacks of using all 2500's in my home rack instead of 2600's.
>One
difference I noted is that the 2500's can run IP plus as highes feature
>set.
They dont come with Enterprise Plus, while 2600 can be configured with
>both
feature sets. Is their something extra that wont be there in IP plus
>for 2500
that i may require for CCIE.
>
>Amit
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:26 GMT-3