From: Ed Lui (edwlui@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 14:20:56 GMT-3
Hi Brian,
So would you suggest me to change my existing c2500-jk8os-l.122-1b.bin
to highest 12.1T Enterprise Plus release for your IERS workbook?
Please advise
Thanks,
-- Edward (A+, Net+, MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, CCNA, CCNP)On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:09:53 -0500, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote: > Keep in mind that the feature navigator and the software advisor > only list "officially" supported features. For example you can get MPLS > to run on the 2500s, but it's not listed in the feature navigator as it > would be a no-no to actually enable it on a 2500 in a production MPLS > network. > > The 2500s are the perfect platform for practicing standalone > features on. 95% of the topics within the scope of the CCIE lab can be > configured on them. The problem however is that they cannot be > configured simultaneously. You can run IPv6, but not simultaneously > with IS-IS. You can run newer 12.2T features, but not simultaneously > with Enterprise features. > > If you're looking for a good all-around feature set to run on > the 2500s, pick the highest 12.1T Enterprise Plus release. This release > will contain all and typically more features than any 12.2 mainline > release. For feature comparison to the 2600s and specific image names > see the following post: > > http://forum.internetworkexpert.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=3&Number > =5171&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1 > > HTH, > > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com > > Internetwork Expert, Inc. > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705 > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705 > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf > Of > > Gajewski Mariusz > > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:46 AM > > To: Church, Chuck; Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > > Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > Wow! So it must be a miracle ;) > > > > BB1(config-if)#ipv6 ospf ? > > <1-65535> Process ID > > cost Interface cost > > database-filter Filter OSPF LSA during synchronization and > flooding > > dead-interval Interval after which a neighbor is declared > dead > > demand-circuit OSPF demand circuit > > flood-reduction OSPF Flood Reduction > > hello-interval Time between HELLO packets > > mtu-ignore Ignores the MTU in DBD packets > > neighbor OSPF neighbor > > network Network type > > priority Router priority > > retransmit-interval Time between retransmitting lost link state > > advertisements > > transmit-delay Link state transmit delay > > > > Soft : c2500-is-l.122-15.T9.bin > > > > With is-is I agree , there's nothing to look for on 25xx , but ipv6 > ospf & > > rip work just fine > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf > Of > > Church, Chuck > > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:28 PM > > To: Amit Jain; Thorne, Gene > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > Subject: RE: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > > > Feature Navigator (www.cisco.com/go/fn) is the tool to use to solve > these > > questions. Basic IPv6 is supported on the 2500s, but if you try to > add > > OSPFv3, you'll see the 2500 support go away. It needs more memory. > > > > > > Chuck Church > > Lead Design Engineer > > CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE > > Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation > > 1210 N. Parker Rd. > > Greenville, SC 29609 > > Home office: 864-335-9473 > > Cell: 703-819-3495 > > cchurch@netcogov.com > > PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf > Of > > Amit > > Jain > > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:37 AM > > To: Thorne, Gene > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > Subject: Re: RE: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > Gene > > > > I used Cisco CCO login to find on Software Advisor that 2500 series IP > > Plus > > images do support IPV6 and some services. Not sure how much is > sufficient > > for CCIE or whether they will have full command set or not. But > definitely > > they support and need 16/16 RAM and Flash > > > > Amit > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 Gene > > Thorne wrote : > > >I searched the archives, but I could not find the previous > > email from Bruce about v6 images for the 2500. If such images do > exist, > > which ones are they? I was under the impression that there were no v6 > > images > > for the 2500, but maybe I missed the reference. > > >-gt > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of > > >Ralph > > >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM > > >To: abcaslow@netmasterclass.net > > >Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > >Subject: Re: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > > > > > >Thanks for the info. Andy!! Now I can get the dust off some of my old > > 2500s, > > and put them to some good use. > > > > > >And actually, Andy, I'm one of those > > numerous friends of yours that you have not actually met. Your book > has > > been > > very useful in my CCIE prep. > > > > > >Thanks again > > >Ralph > > > > > >-----Original > > Message----- > > > From: "Andrew B. Caslow" <abcaslow@netmasterclass.net> > > >To: > > "'Ralph'" <Mandela@myrealbox.com> > > >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:27:48 -0500 > > >Subject: RE: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > > >Whoop, Sorry Ralph! I thought you > > were a friend of mine. I apologize for > > >responding to your e-mail as if your > > name was "Raj". > > > > > >I think you will find the contents of my previous e-maul > > useful. As I > > >mentioned, there are images for the 2500 platform that run v6. > > Good luck in > > >your studies. > > > > > >I hope all is well. > > > > > >-Bruce Caslow CCIE #3139 > > > NetMasterClass, LLC > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > From: > > nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > > >Ralph > > >Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:54 AM > > >To: netsteps@rediffmail.com > > >Cc: > > ccielab@groupstudy.com > > >Subject: Re: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > > >You > > definitely a few 2600's. I do not think the 2500's can run the IPv6 > > >code, and > > some of the new features in 12.2T. > > > > > >R. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > From: > > netsteps@rediffmail.com > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com > > >Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 > > 01:10:27 -0500 > > >Subject: 2500 or 2600 for home lab? > > > > > >Hey all > > > > > >I am about > > to purchase my home lab for scheduled CCIE Lab. Please advise me > > >the > > drawbacks of using all 2500's in my home rack instead of 2600's. > > >One > > difference I noted is that the 2500's can run IP plus as highes > feature > > >set. > > They dont come with Enterprise Plus, while 2600 can be configured with > > >both > > feature sets. Is their something extra that wont be there in IP plus > > >for 2500 > > that i may require for CCIE. > > > > > >Amit > > > > > > >_______________________________________________________________________ > > >Subscription information may be found at: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > >_______________________________________________________________________ > > >Subscription information may be found at: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > >_______________________________________________________________________ > > >Subscription information may be found at: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > >_______________________________________________________________________ > > >Subscription information may be found at: > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:26 GMT-3