From: Bob Sinclair (bsinclair@netmasterclass.net)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2005 - 10:09:56 GMT-3
Anthony,
Hate to quote scripture, but no time to lab this up. According to the Beau
Williamson, Developing IP Multicast Networks, page 320, the access-list goes
on every router with the static rp-address statement. This makes some
sense: you would not want other routers building shared trees to, or
registering traffic with, an RP that cannot service it.
HTH,
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427, CISSP
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Sequeira" <terry.francona@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:16 PM
Subject: PIM Sparse Mode - Static RP
> Hope everyone is well! Thanks so much for making this group so AWESOME!
>
> Now for my query.....
>
> Let's say that I am configuring Spase Mode PIM on three of my routers.
>
> I also want to statically configure the RP and limit the RP to
> servicing groups in the 239.192.0.0/16 range.
>
> Since the static RP command (ip pim rp-address) must be placed on all
> my routers - must I also place the access list on them all as well? So
> each of the three routers will possess the following commands:
>
> ip pim rp-address 5.5.47.1 myrpaccesslist
>
> ip access-list standard myrpaccesslist
> permit 239.192.0.0 0.0.255.255
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:22 GMT-3