From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2005 - 15:43:33 GMT-3
Actually, the ACL will need to go on every router.
Otherwise you will be faced with a situation where the "other" router think
the RP does everything but the RP thinks it only does certain groups.
Just makes for extra traffic and much gnashing of teeth. At least if
routers had teeth. :)
Scott Morris, MCSE, CCDP, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
#4713, JNCIP, CCNA-WAN Switching, CCSP, Cable Communications Specialist, IP
Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design Specialist, CISSP
CCSI #21903
swm@emanon.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Balaji Siva
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:47 PM
To: Anthony Sequeira
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: PIM Sparse Mode - Static RP
Only on the RP
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:16:31 -0500, Anthony Sequeira
<terry.francona@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hope everyone is well! Thanks so much for making this group so AWESOME!
>
> Now for my query.....
>
> Let's say that I am configuring Spase Mode PIM on three of my routers.
>
> I also want to statically configure the RP and limit the RP to
> servicing groups in the 239.192.0.0/16 range.
>
> Since the static RP command (ip pim rp-address) must be placed on all
> my routers - must I also place the access list on them all as well? So
> each of the three routers will possess the following commands:
>
> ip pim rp-address 5.5.47.1 myrpaccesslist
>
> ip access-list standard myrpaccesslist permit 239.192.0.0 0.0.255.255
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:22 GMT-3