From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2005 - 11:18:31 GMT-3
Azhar,
No, the command does not do this. This is what the command is
MISdocumented to do. Have you tested this?
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> azhar mumtaz
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:01 AM
> To: joshua lauer; McLaughlin, Jeffery
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IEWB Lab 2 Task 9.10 [More arp frame-relay]
>
> Hi Joshua:
> The command " no frame-relay inverse-arp " and " no
> arp frame-relay " are redundant. What " no arp
> frame-relay " does is if any body is coming to you to
> get information, you will not respond, if you have
> this command enable.
>
> Therefore, if you have a protocol defined on the
> interface, and you don't have a frame relay map
> statement for that protocol address, that is when we
> will arp for the DLCI. " no arp frame-relay " will
> prevent this.
>
> Thanks
> Azhar
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo!
> http://my.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:21 GMT-3