From: istong@stong.org
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 20:44:58 GMT-3
I think the real reason you see this is due to the flash and
memory options on the XM versus the 3620. The XM can handle
256MB Ram and 48 MB flash so features like OSPF v3 are
supported whereas the 3620 is much much more limited
Ian
www.ccie4u.com
> Edwards, Andrew M wrote:
>
> >Does anyone else find it odd that OSPFv3 is not supported
> in the 3620 >router platform, but it is in the 2600XM?
> >
> >Or is this one of those IOS things where you gotta know
> someone who has >a pilot that was never made for major
> distribution like MPLS on a 2500? >
> >andsy
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> ______________ >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> __________________________________________________________
> _____________ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
______________________________________________
Check Your Email From Any Where in the World!
Tell Your Friends about MyEmail.com!
______________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 03 2005 - 10:31:24 GMT-3