From: one more adventurer (an_adventurer@mail.ru)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 11:06:09 GMT-3
No,
DELL is not supported by CCM, just MCS, HP and IBM.
Nell
-----Original Message-----
From: "sameer inam" <i_sameer@hotmail.com>
To: ccie2be@nyc.rr.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:19:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Standard compression methods
>
> Hi ,
>
> I just want some information .Is dell server is supporting cisco call
> manager software .Is there any problem to install the software. can you
> give the reply back .I really thankfull to you.
>
> Regards
>
> Sameer
>
> >From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> >Reply-To: "ccie2be"
> <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> >To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>,
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Subject: Re: Standard compression methods
> >Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:23 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from
> mc3-f15.hotmail.com ([64.4.50.151]) by mc3-s14.hotmail.com with Microsoft
> SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:00:54 -0800 >Received: from
> lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by mc3-f15.hotmail.com with
> Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:00:40 -0800
> >Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
> id iAKF0VG24097;Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:31 -0500 >Received: from
> groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [216.52.207.154])by lists.groupstudy.com
> (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAKF0Qo24073for
> <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500
> >Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
> groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAKF0Q7t007997GroupStudy
> Mailer; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500 >Received: (from
> listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id
> iAKF0QWE007995for GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500
> >Received: from ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com
> (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.6]) by groupstudy.com
> (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAKF0Q8g007975 GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20
> Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500 >Received: from JimPC (24-90-219-30.nyc.rr.com
> [24.90.219.30]) by ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP
> id iAKF0LBM028989; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:21 -0500 (EST) >X-Message-Info:
> 2DNiTwDvhE3Th7Vl2LfI+fQFWn9jqswsXjBBglYVMKs= >References:
> <29466585.1100961456836.JavaMail.root@skeeter.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 >X-Virus-Scanned:
> Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine >X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from
> ccie2be@nyc\.rr\.com] (2004/11/20 10:00:26) >X-Loop:
> ccielab@groupstudy.com >X-Sequence: 27675 >Errors-to:
> ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com >Precedence: bulk >X-no-archive: yes
> >List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com> >List-Help:
> <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help> >List-Subscribe:
> <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
> >List-Unsubscribe:
> <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab> >List-Post:
> <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com> >List-Owner:
> <mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com> >Return-Path:
> ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2004
> 15:00:40.0884 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3A97F40:01C4CF11] > >Joe, > >Actually,
> that's not a silly question. In the case of compression, YES, it >does
> have to be configured on both sides of link, but there are a number of
> >other configuration commands that aren't or don't have to be
> "Symmetrical". > >When you think about what compression is doing, it
> makes sense that >compression has to be configured on both sides for a
> couple of reasons. > >1) If compression is only configured on one side,
> how would the other side >know what to do with the bits it's getting. To
> the side without compression >configured, it would appear as just a
> stream of garbage. ( I'm not >referring to ppp which might negotiate if
> and what type of compression to >use). > >2) There are multiple types of
> compression that could be used including >header, payload, Stac,
> Predictor, and maybe others I'm not aware of. If one >side is using one
> type of compression and the other side isn't using >compression or is
> using a different type of compression, you'll have a >mismatch. > >On the
> other hand, I can think of a few things which don't have to be
> >symmetric. For example, queueing and shaping and filtering. And, if you
> >think about dialup links, there are a number of additional things that
> you >might configure on only one side. For example, one-way
> authenitication, >dialer idle-timeout, dialer load-threshold, etc. >
> >HTH, Tim >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Joe Chang"
> <changjoe@earthlink.net> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Sent: Saturday,
> November 20, 2004 9:37 AM >Subject: Re: Standard compression methods > >
> > > Silly question: does compression have to be configured on both sides
> of a >point to point link, or would configuring just one side work? > > >
> > > > > Tim, > > > > > > Stac is Cisco proprietary. If Cisco uses
> standard compression, then it >must be Predictr. > > > > > > ccie2be
> <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Of the different
> 2p2 link payload compression methods available, which >ones > > > are
> "Standard" and will therefore interoperate with non-cisco routers? > > >
> > > > I believe Predictor is the only one, but can anyone confirm that? >
> > > > > > TIA, Tim > > > >
> _______________________________________________________________________ >
> > Subscription information may be found at: > >
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar MSN Toolbar Get it now!
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:48 GMT-3