From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 10:46:04 GMT-3
Do you have access to www.cisco.com? I am pretty sure you can find your
answer there.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
sameer inam
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 5:19 AM
To: ccie2be@nyc.rr.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Standard compression methods
Hi ,
I just want some information .Is dell server is supporting cisco call
manager software .Is there any problem to install the software. can you
give the reply back .I really thankfull to you.
Regards
Sameer
>From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> >Reply-To: "ccie2be"
<ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> >To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>,
<ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Subject: Re: Standard compression methods
>Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:23 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from
mc3-f15.hotmail.com ([64.4.50.151]) by mc3-s14.hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:00:54 -0800 >Received: from
lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by mc3-f15.hotmail.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:00:40 -0800
>Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
id iAKF0VG24097;Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:31 -0500 >Received: from
groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [216.52.207.154])by lists.groupstudy.com
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAKF0Qo24073for
<ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500
>Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAKF0Q7t007997GroupStudy
Mailer; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500 >Received: (from
listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id
iAKF0QWE007995for GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500
>Received: from ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com
(ms-smtp-02-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.6]) by groupstudy.com
(8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAKF0Q8g007975 GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20
Nov 2004 10:00:26 -0500 >Received: from JimPC (24-90-219-30.nyc.rr.com
[24.90.219.30]) by ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP
id iAKF0LBM028989; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:00:21 -0500 (EST) >X-Message-Info:
2DNiTwDvhE3Th7Vl2LfI+fQFWn9jqswsXjBBglYVMKs= >References:
<29466585.1100961456836.JavaMail.root@skeeter.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 >X-Virus-Scanned:
Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine >X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from
ccie2be@nyc\.rr\.com] (2004/11/20 10:00:26) >X-Loop:
ccielab@groupstudy.com >X-Sequence: 27675 >Errors-to:
ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com >Precedence: bulk >X-no-archive: yes
>List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com> >List-Help:
<mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help> >List-Subscribe:
<mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
>List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab> >List-Post:
<mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com> >List-Owner:
<mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com> >Return-Path:
ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Nov 2004
15:00:40.0884 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3A97F40:01C4CF11] > >Joe, > >Actually,
that's not a silly question. In the case of compression, YES, it >does
have to be configured on both sides of link, but there are a number of
>other configuration commands that aren't or don't have to be
"Symmetrical". > >When you think about what compression is doing, it
makes sense that >compression has to be configured on both sides for a
couple of reasons. > >1) If compression is only configured on one side,
how would the other side >know what to do with the bits it's getting. To
the side without compression >configured, it would appear as just a
stream of garbage. ( I'm not >referring to ppp which might negotiate if
and what type of compression to >use). > >2) There are multiple types of
compression that could be used including >header, payload, Stac,
Predictor, and maybe others I'm not aware of. If one >side is using one
type of compression and the other side isn't using >compression or is
using a different type of compression, you'll have a >mismatch. > >On the
other hand, I can think of a few things which don't have to be
>symmetric. For example, queueing and shaping and filtering. And, if you
>think about dialup links, there are a number of additional things that
you >might configure on only one side. For example, one-way
authenitication, >dialer idle-timeout, dialer load-threshold, etc. >
>HTH, Tim >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Joe Chang"
<changjoe@earthlink.net> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com> >Sent: Saturday,
November 20, 2004 9:37 AM >Subject: Re: Standard compression methods > >
> > Silly question: does compression have to be configured on both sides
of a >point to point link, or would configuring just one side work? > > >
> > > > Tim, > > > > > > Stac is Cisco proprietary. If Cisco uses
standard compression, then it >must be Predictr. > > > > > > ccie2be
<ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Of the different
2p2 link payload compression methods available, which >ones > > > are
"Standard" and will therefore interoperate with non-cisco routers? > > >
> > > I believe Predictor is the only one, but can anyone confirm that? >
> > > > > TIA, Tim > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:48 GMT-3