From: Tom Lijnse (Tom.Lijnse@globalknowledge.nl)
Date: Wed Nov 17 2004 - 12:29:05 GMT-3
Hmmm,
That's interesting. If the proctors specifically state that it's not on the lab anymore why doesn't Cisco simply put it on the list of excluded protocols like they did with IGRP, Token Ring, IPX, LANE, Appletalk and all the other "old school" stuff they don't want you to bother with anymore.
If this is official Cisco policy, then why not announce it publicly on the CCIE pages?
Tom Lijnse
CCIE #11031
Global Knowledge Netherlands
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph D. Phillips [mailto:josephdphillips@fastmail.us]
Sent: woensdag 17 november 2004 15:44
To: Tom Lijnse; Ivan Ostre9; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: RIPv1 - yes or no
RIPv1 was taken off the lab over a year ago. This is not a violation of the
NDA. I've taken it four times and the proctor specifically states before you
take the exam that there's no RIPv1. Don't worry about it. Don't study it.
Let it die.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lijnse" <Tom.Lijnse@globalknowledge.nl>
To: "Ivan Ostre9" <ivan.ostres@snt.hr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:07 AM
Subject: RE: RIPv1 - yes or no
> Hi Ivan,
>
> I think nobody except Cisco could confirm something like that. It is not
on the blueprint, but it is also not specifically excluded (like for
instance Token Ring and IGRP). Therefore it is in a grey area where it would
be fair game on the lab, though Cisco probably does not consider it a core
topic, since it's not in the blueprint.
>
> The only way to way to really confirm that it is or is not on the lab
would be by people breaking the NDA to tell you if they had it on their
specific lab or not. And even then it could always be introduced or left out
of future labs at Cisco's will, since it is not on the list of excluded
topics and is configurable on the equipment.
>
> On the other hand, I personally feel that anybody who is comfortable with
IP (VLSM, subnetting, summarization) and the IP Routing protocols at the
CCIE level should have the skills to deal with RIPv1. Just practice with it
for a bit to get a feel for typical peculiarities of a classfull protocol,
but don't spend weeks on it.
>
> Of course this is just my personal interpretation of Cisco's published
guidelines, so I'd definitely be interested to hear what other people think
of this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Lijnse
>
> CCIE #11031
> Global Knowledge Netherlands
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ivan Ostre9
> Sent: woensdag 17 november 2004 13:17
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RIPv1 - yes or no
>
> Hello GS,
>
> I just have seen on
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/ccie/rs/lab_exam_blueprint.html
that
> RIPv1 is NOT in the Lab blueprint. Can someone confirm for sure that RIPv1
> is/is not on the lab?
>
> Regards,
> Ivan
>
> P.S: If it's not, I'll miss those FSLM/VSLM shit... :-)
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a
name of winmail.dat]
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:46 GMT-3