From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Mon Nov 15 2004 - 00:59:42 GMT-3
Hi all,
I am always refused by these two commands, what the different between them
indeed?
Thx,
BBD
"Joe Rinehart"
<jjrinehart@hotma To: "Koen Peetermans" <K.Peetermans@chello.be>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Joe
il.com> Rothstein" <ziutek@mac.com>
Sent by: cc:
nobody@groupstudy Subject: Re: Passive Interface on Async Line
.com
11/10/2004 12:52
AM
Please respond to
"Joe Rinehart"
That did it thanks guys!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Koen Peetermans" <K.Peetermans@chello.be>
To: "'Joe Rinehart'" <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: Passive Interface on Async Line
> Try with "async default routing" instead of "async dynamic routing" ?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joe
> Rinehart
> Sent: dinsdag 9 november 2004 17:36
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Passive Interface on Async Line
>
> Need some insight...
>
> I have a back to back async connection between 2 routers in my pod that
has
> ip connectivity just fine but the routing protocol is showing up as
passive
> no matter what I do. Here is the configuration:
>
> interface Async1
> ip unnumbered Loopback0
> encapsulation ppp
> async dynamic routing
> async mode dedicated
> cdp enable
> !
> router ospf 1
> router-id 172.16.102.1
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 172.16.102.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
>
> line aux 0
> exec-timeout 0 0
> modem InOut
> transport input all
> flowcontrol hardware
>
> any insight here???
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:45 GMT-3