From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Sun Nov 14 2004 - 02:35:30 GMT-3
my mistake on the "pri"......the commands seem to "blur" together ;)
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
To: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>; "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: ip rtp priorty with frts
> John,
>
> Actually, there's no "pri" in the match prot ip rtp <low port#> <high port
> #> statement.
>
> According to Wendell Odom, in his book, DQOS, both do the same thing.
> However, now Cisco recommends configuring ip rtp priority inside a
> map-class.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Matus" <jmatus@pacbell.net>
> To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 8:33 PM
> Subject: Re: ip rtp priorty with frts
>
>
>> actaully, both configs were correct..........i left out "priority X"
>> under
>> CBWFQ because i wasn't sure how that translated to "frame ip rtp pri
>> 16384
>> 16383" since there is also no specific priority indicated <i.e.- 75%>
>> how
>> doest this second statement decide what the priority is??.....lets try
>> again, since i now see on my router that i forgot to specify
> bandwidth.....
>>
>> map-classs frame frts
>> frame ip rtp priority 16384 16383 200
>>
>> and
>>
>> map-class frame frts
>> service policy out rtp
>>
>> class-map match-all rtp
>> match pro ip rtp pri 16384 16383
>>
>> policy-map rtp
>> class rtp
>> bandwidth 200
>>
>> ok,,,,,, now is there any functional difference ?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> John D. Matus
>> MCSE, CCNP
>> Office: 818-782-2061
>> Cell: 818-430-8372
>> jmatus@pacbell.net
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
>> To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 4:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: ip rtp priorty with frts
>>
>>
>> > Hey Joe,
>> >
>> > I think the 2nd example was just incomplete. I suspect the 2nd was
>> > meant
>> > to
>> > look like this:
>> >
>> > map-class frame frts
>> > service policy out rtp
>> >
>> > class-map match-all rtp
>> > match prot ip rtp 16384 16383
>> >
>> > policy-map rtp
>> > class rtp
>> > priority X
>> >
>> > I think there was another mistake (or typo) that confused the issue a
> bit.
>> > In the 2nd example under the class-map, the match prot statement had
> match
>> > prot ip rtp **pri** 16384 16383 instead of match prot ip rtp 16384
> 16383.
>> >
>> > Also, I think the above DOES create a strict priority queue for rtp
>> > traffic,
>> > assuming the 2nd example as shown above is what was meant. In fact,
>> > the
>> > example above is also known as LLQ. So, it's my thought that both
> examples
>> > do the same thing.
>> >
>> > Do you agree?
>> >
>> > Tim
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
>> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> > Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 7:04 PM
>> > Subject: Re: ip rtp priorty with frts
>> >
>> >
>> >> The first config:
>> >>
>> >> > map-classs frame frts
>> >> > frame ip rtp priority 16384 16383
>> >>
>> >> creates a priority queue for rtp traffic, in addition to the other
>> >> shaping
>> > queues FRTS utilizes.
>> >>
>> >> The second config:
>> >>
>> >> > map-class frame frts
>> >> > service policy out rtp
>> >> >
>> >> > class-map match-all rtp
>> >> > match pro ip rtp pri 16384 16383
>> >> >
>> >> > policy-map rtp
>> >> > class rtp...............
>> >>
>> >> creates a CBWFQ shaping queue, but does not seem to prioritze the rtp
>> > traffic.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:43 GMT-3