RE: ppp multilink: prevent one side from adding/removing links

From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 13:21:26 GMT-3


Geert,

        Did you try just removing the "dialer load-threshold" command
from the side that you don't want to initiate the multilink bundle?

Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Geert Nijs
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 2:44 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ppp multilink: prevent one side from adding/removing links
>
> Hi group,
>
>
>
> In a dial scenario, I have one central site router R1 with a PRI and
> several remote sites (R2,R3,R4) with (one or more) BRIs.
>
> All routers are running multilink ppp. The problem I am having know is
> that when the connection to ex. R2 is fully loaded, R1 constantly
dials
> R2 to add links.
>
> I want to prevent R1 from adding or removing ANY links in the
multilinks
> bundle. ALL adding and removing of links should be done by the remote
> sites (R2,..)
>
>
>
> I can't use 'ppp multilink max-links' because some sites have one bri,
> other sites have more BRIs. Bandwidth differs from site to site and
you
> can't put a
>
> 'ppp multilink max-links' on a 'dialer map' statement (I am using
legacy
> DDR with rotary groups, so I only have one multipoint dialer interface
> on R1)
>
>
>
> Indeed, one option would be to use dialer profiles. This would require
> not using one multipoint-interface, but all point-to-point interfaces
> for each site. However,
> I would be able to specify 'ppp multilink max-links' on each
> separate dialer interface.....and a lot of work, plus ip address
> changes.
>
>
>
> I can't remove the phone numbers on the dialer map statements on R1,
so
> that R1 can't dial. Both routers should be able
> to initiate a connection, but one R2 should decide to add or drop a
> line.
>
>
>
> Dialer load-threshold 255 .........will add links when load reaches
> 100%, so no good
>
>
>
> Any other ideas ?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Geert
>
>
>
########################################################################
##
> ###
> ########
> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and may be legally
> privileged.
> If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, copying,
> distribution,
> or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.
> If you have received this transmission in error please notify Simac
> immediately
> and then delete this e-mail.
>
> Simac has taken all reasonable precautions to avoid virusses in this
> email.
> Simac does not accept liability for damage by virusses, for the
correct
> and
> complete
> transmission of the information, nor for any delay or interruption of
the
> transmission,
> nor for damages arising from the use of or reliance on the
information.
>
> All e-mail messages addressed to, received or sent by Simac or Simac
> employees
> are deemed to be professional in nature. Accordingly, the sender or
> recipient
> of
> these messages agrees that they may be read by other Simac employees
than
> the
> official
> recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related
> activities
> and allow supervision thereof.
>
########################################################################
##
> ###
> ########
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 06:57:41 GMT-3