From: Radu Pavaloiu (Radu.Pavaloiu@connex.ro)
Date: Fri Oct 29 2004 - 04:03:50 GMT-3
No, If you have a RR in AS 1000, let's say R2 with R1 as client. And RR
reflects the best paths ( let's say from R1 ). When R1 receives the
advertisement and see the same Router-ID ( R1 ) ----> withdrawn. So R1
have the prefix only from EGP session with AS54.
I die. I fracture into thousands of fragments of flushed embarrassment.
My body parts fly, connectionless, over a badly constructed spanning
tree that isn't quite loop free.
I fall screaming into 127.0.0.1.
Radu
CCNP, CCDP
#2658
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nico van Niekerk
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 9:50 AM
To: CCIELAB
Subject: BGP
If you have:
AS54----R1----R2----R3----R4----AS54
R1-4 are in AS100, shouldn't all AS100 routers have 2 entries for all
the AS54 networks in their BGP talbes?
What does this message mean from a debug ip bgp updates inbound
BGP(0): 174.2.23.3 rcv UPDATE about 113.0.0.0/8 -- withdrawn
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:54 GMT-3