From: Cristian Henry H (chenry@reuna.cl)
Date: Fri Oct 22 2004 - 09:14:46 GMT-3
Scott Morris ha escrito:
>
> The original RFC 1795 had tcp 2067 to 2065. The new RFC 2166 has source
> 11xxx tcp to 2065 as you see in your capture!
>
> UDP from port 0 to port 2067 is used for the reachability requests.
>
> So stuff has simply changed!
>
> HTH,
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> gladston@br.ibm.com
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 5:09 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Port 2065 and 2067
>
> Never mind. I remembered the good command "sh tcp brief".
> It might be an error on the CiscoPress book and doc CD about port 2067. (or
> stuff has changed?)
>
> r8#sh tcp brief
> TCB Local Address Foreign Address (state)
> 007D24B8 10.4.78.8.179 10.4.78.7.12093 ESTAB
> 007D4A08 10.4.8.8.11001 150.1.5.5.179 ESTAB
> 007EDA44 10.4.8.8.11002 10.4.4.4.2065 ESTAB
> r8#
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Cristian E. Henry REUNAE-mail: chenry@reuna.cl Fono: 56-2-3370336
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:51 GMT-3