From: Tomaz Klemencic (Tomaz.Klemencic@hermes-plus.si)
Date: Fri Oct 22 2004 - 06:26:57 GMT-3
Hi,
under rip you redistribute ospf routes into rip - so routes are comming from ospf into rip. The distribite-list command should use "in" parameter
distribute-list 1 in ospf 1
Tomaz
____________________
Tomaz Klemencic
system engineer
S&T Hermes Plus, d.d.
PE Celje
Kersnikova 19
3000 Celje
phone +386 3 4284 022
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ivan Ostre9
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 11:14 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject:
Hi all,
I'm doing following thing:
router ospf 1
network x.x.x.x area y
router rip
network z.z.z.z area u
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1
distribute-list 1 out ospf 1
access-list 1 deny any
The thing is that I have a bunch of routers learned trough OSPF. Now,
I've expected that using "distribute-list 1 out ospf 1" I would not
allow any of the ospf route to be redistributed to rip (filter the
routes that are comming from ospf - this is on purpose just to understand how
this works).
Now if I do "show ip rip database" I can see all OSPF routes
redistributed to the local rip database.
Question 1: Does that mean that rip will use "distribute-list" statement
only when sending updates out to other rip routers for routes learned
trough "ospf 1"?
Question 2: Is there any other way to fix FLSM/VLSM redistributing
problem than summarization to classfull network, default route, static
route???
-- -Ivan.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:51 GMT-3